Jun 29, 2006  Share this Rating. Title: Chelovek v futlyare, chelovek v palto i chelovek vo frake (2005) 6.3 /10. Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Physiology (Biology 327) - Dr. Saupe; College of St. Benedict/ St. John's University; Biology Department; Collegeville, MN 56321; (320) 363 - 2782; (320) 363 - 3202, fax; Measuring the Water Status of Potato Tubers Objectives: Upon completion of this laboratory you should be able to: • determine the water potential of a plant tissue by the and techniques and understand the underlying theory. • determine the osmotic potential of a plant extract by the and understand the underlying theory. • describe techniques for measuring the pressure potential of a plant tissue.

• describe techniques for measuring plant water status such as the pressure bomb, vapor pressure osmometer, and psychrometer. Introduction Water potential (Ψ w, psi), which is a measure of the energy state of water is affected by dissolved solutes, pressure and matrix particles. The contribution to water potential by dissolved solutes, termed osmotic potential (Ψ s ), is always negative in sign. In other words, solutes decrease the water potential. The contribution of pressure (Ψ p) may be positive, negative or zero, but is generally positive since most plant cells are turgid (turgor pressure). The contribution due to the binding of water to colloidal particles (matric) and surfaces, termed matric potential (Ψ m), also lowers the water potential.

Although it is often small enough to be ignored, matrix potential is important when considering soil water relations. Thus, the water potential of a plant system can be arithmetically represented by the equation: Ψ w = Ψ s + Ψ p + Ψ m In this lab we will use the and techniques to determine the water potential (Ψ w) of a potato tuber cells. We will determine the solute potential (Ψ s ) by the Method.

Pressure in the cells can be arithmetically calculated once Ψ s and Ψ w are known. If time permits, we will also measure the water conductivity of potato tubers, determine the Q10 for water transport into potatoes and prepare a Hofler diagram.

Pre-Lab: • Email to me before lab begins the answers to questions 1-6 in the. • Print copies of this exercise and the following handouts and bring them all to lab: • • • Post-Lab Assignment • Write an of this experiment • Append to your abstract the following ( be sure to include appropriate captions for your tables and graphs): • Tables 1 & 2. Calculate the water potential of the potato based on these data. Plot% change in weight vs. [sucrose]; include best fit line with regression analysis data. Calculate the water potential of the potato based on these data.

In your abstract discuss how the water potential values obtained from the Chardakov and Gravimetric techniques compare and which is likely most accurate. • Tables 1 & 2. Plot temperature vs. Time for both water and sap on the same graph. • In your abstract be sure to include: the pressure (Ψ p) in the potato cells and discussion whether the data you collected supported your hypotheses. References: • Barcelo, AR, AA Calderon and R Munoz (1994) Measuring water conductivity coefficients in plant tissues.

Journal of Biological Education 28: 83 – 85. Tanner (1985) Measurement of the water potential of stored potato tubers. Plant Physiology 79: 891-895.

• Boyer, JS (1969) Measurement of the water status of plants. ARPP 20:351-364. • Koning, R (1999) Web Site: • Kramer, P (1983) Water Relations of Plants. Academic Press, NY. • Meidner, H (1984) Class Experiments in Plant Physiology. George Albert Unwin, Boston. • Reiss, Carol (1994) Experiments in Plant Physiology.

Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. • Ross, C (1974) Plant Physiology Lab Manual. Lab Documents: • & • • • • • •.

I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: This file is licensed under the license. You are free: • to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work • to remix – to adapt the work Under the following conditions: • attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

• share alike – If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under the same or similar license to this one. CC BY-SA 3.0 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 true true File history. This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong. Software used Conversion program LibreOffice 3.4 Encrypted no Page size 595 x 842 pts (A4) Version of PDF format 1.4.

Instead, the flocks who bought did so based on 's multimedia appeal: she's a self-proclaimed prophetess, best-selling author, speaker, televangelist.and now bona fide contemporary gospel singer. But the thing with is how little of it actually is gospel music. Any crown juanita bynum free mp3 download 2017. It was an impressive feat no matter how you looked at it: 's day job isn't music, the album was released independently, and there was no blockbuster marketing plan behind it.